Why sexual and reproductive law for east African countries is being resisted

Six of the countries of the East African Community – Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Uganda and Tanzania – recently concluded public hearings on a new sexual and reproductive health bill. Proponents of the bill argue that it will improve access to sexual and reproductive health which, in turn, will improve other public health and development indicators such as maternal mortality and HIV infection rates. But the bill has faced fierce opposition since it was first tabled in 2017. The Conversation Africa’s Ina Skosana spoke to researchers Anthony Ajayi and Nicholas Etyang to unpack what the bill covers and where the sticking points are.

Contents

Is a regional response practical? Has it worked anywhere else?

Article 118 of the Treaty for the Establishment of East African Community mandates partner states to cooperate around health issues, and to develop policies for the region.

Regional responses can help fast-track progress, harmonise laws and create a uniform front for addressing sexual and reproductive health issues. The development of regional frameworks is not new on the continent. Other examples include the South Africa Development Community sexual and reproductive health strategy 2019-2030, South Africa Development Community model law on gender-based violence, and the regional body’s model law on eradicating child marriage and protecting children already in marriage.

Regional frameworks help citizens hold their governments to account. The East Africa region is pushing for integration on many fronts. These include immigration policies, trade, and security. Remarkable progress has been made in the areas of trade and immigration. This could be repeated with health cooperation.

But getting regional laws through is hard. In the case of East Africa, seven countries are part of the East Africa Community. Getting everyone on board is a tough ask especially when it comes to contentious issues like sexual and reproductive healthcare.

The first attempt to pass an East African sexual and reproductive health bill was in 2017, with the 3rd Legislative Assembly. But numerous concerns were raised by stakeholders. And limited time for consultation before the end of their term meant the bill could not move forward.

The 4th Legislative Assembly began working on a revised bill in January 2020 and has conducted a series of stakeholder consultations. But resistance continues.

Why does the bill matter?

The 2021 version of the bill is a progressive legislation. It has huge potential to address the sexual and reproductive health challenges of East Africans. Adolescent girls are disproportionately affected by sexual and reproductive health issues. The bill addresses these disparities substantively.

In East Africa, complications arising from early pregnancy and child birth are among the leading causes of death among girls aged 15 to 19 years. Young girls are also disproportionately exposed to new HIV infections and sexual violence. If passed, the bill will address adolescent pregnancy and protect the right of young mothers to return to school.

Unsafe abortions are also among the leading causes of maternal death. These account for about 10% of maternal mortality. By expanding access to safe abortion, more lives would be saved. If passed, the bill will be a huge win for women’s and girls’ reproductive rights in the region.

What’s in the Bill?

The sexual and reproductive health Bill lays out five ambitious objectives. These are:

to protect and facilitate the fulfilment of all persons’ sexual and reproductive health and rights across the life course;

to promote and provide age-appropriate sexual and reproductive health information and services for all persons, including adolescents and young people

to facilitate and promote the prevention of newborn, child mortality, maternal mortality, and morbidity from preventable causes;

to facilitate and promote the reduction and elimination of unsafe abortions, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, early and unintended pregnancies; and

to prohibit and facilitate the elimination of harmful practices.

The Bill has 29 clauses covering a range of issues. These include integration of sexual and reproductive health services into universal health coverage, sexuality education, continuation of education after pregnancy, menstrual health as well as family planning.

In addition, the Bill makes provisions to safeguard the sexual and reproductive health and rights of people with disabilities.

Section 16 provides limited access to abortion on the grounds that, in the opinion of a health worker, the pregnancy can endanger the mental or physical health or life of the woman. Additionally, in case of sexual assault, rape, and incest.

Section 17 protects the right of women and girls to post-abortion care irrespective of the legality of the abortion. It also shields health workers from prosecution for providing post-abortion care.

Section 21 recommends restricting the use of assisted reproductive technology such as surrogacy for only those medically diagnosed as unable to bear children. In addition, it recommends that partner states give special licenses to designated providers and protect surrogate mothers from exploitation.

Section 22 prohibits harmful cultural practices such as child marriage, forced sterilisation, and female genital mutilation.

Lastly, the Bill mandates partner states to develop and implement common strategies for detecting, preventing and reporting sexual and gender-based violence.

What’s the hold-up in passing it?

The Bill faced opposition at the public hearings held on June 27-30. Some oppose the Bill entirely, while others want specific provisions removed.

Resistance is primarily from religious and conservative groups, who maintain that some provisions of the Bill are part of the Western agenda, and against East African cultural values.

Three sections of the Bill remain contentious despite the revisions made after the first reading and stakeholder consultations.

First is the provision for comprehensive sexuality education for young people, which they oppose because they believe it will expose children to early sex. Some question why the government should be responsible for providing sex education to children instead of parents. They also oppose contraceptive access for young people and argue that abstinence-only messages should be provided to young people. This is despite scientific evidence to the contrary.