Vandalism...Is it covered?

The term vandalism can be traced to ancient Rome, where in 455 A.D., the “Vandals”, a Germanic tribe at war with the Romans, destroyed many of the city’s monuments and works of art. Since that time, the word “ vandalism” has come to mean any destruction of real or personal property.

Suppose a willful and wanton act of damage occurs to your home or business. Is it a covered loss? Does your insurance company pay for such a loss? The answer is, mostly “yes”.

In addition to the provisions of the controlling policy, vandalism or malicious mischief coverage is subject to a variety of special conditions, depending on the type of policy to which the insurance is attached. These provisions must be carefully inspected in light of the particular coverage form or endorsement under consideration. For example, under the commercial property forms, vandalism coverage does not extend to loss or damage to glass (other than glass building blocks) that is part of a building, structure, or an outside sign. It also does not apply to loss or damage caused by or resulting from theft, except for building damage caused by burglars breaking in or exiting. Another standard provision is that, if the building becomes vacant for a certain length of time, coverage for vandalism is excluded.

Some insurance property forms that are part of a policy make an exception to the exclusion of damage caused by or resulting from theft in relation to the vandalism coverage. The insurer will pay for building damage caused by the breaking in or exiting of burglars. This provision attempts to settle the argument by at least clearly allowing recovery for building damage certain to accompany a burglary. Burglary means “the act of breaking into a building.” This modification may have improved the situation for the owner of premises rented to others who would not ordinarily be carrying burglary or theft insurance; but, it did not address the basic question, at least, for those who take the position that the exclusion must be interpreted as applying only to so much of the loss as is directly due to pilferage, theft, burglary, or larceny.

See also  The greatest teams set for the 2023 Rugby World Cup showdown

However, the question remains as to whether or not the specific coverage of damage by burglars to a building automatically rule out malicious damage to contents by burglars? Current commercial property forms do not address the contents question and it is reasonable to exclude such damage at first blush. However, the parties concerned must still sort out the loss. Was this item damaged by vandalism or was the damage caused by the theft? Can the loss be apportioned to a specific cause and paid accordingly? Other questions, those involving vacancies also need to be answered.

In most current property forms. the vacancy clause states that if the building where loss or damage occurs has been vacant for more than sixty consecutive days before the loss, the insurer will not pay for any loss or damage caused by vandalism. The clause then defines a vacant building as one that does not contain enough business personal property to conduct customary operations. Thus, the definition of vacancy (as provided in the form) has been expanded to limit coverage for buildings that are not completely devoid of either contents or occupants. Buildings under construction or renovation are specifically exempt from the vacancy provision; such buildings are not considered vacant.

Fire damage caused by vandals is usually covered under the standard fire cause of loss, just as explosion damage caused by vandals is protected as part of the explosion cause of loss; vandalism or malicious mischief insurance need not be involved. This may vary, however. in many current homeowners’ policies. We just need to examine the “fine print” of the policy to be sure.

See also  For the new vape laws to succeed, these 3 things need to happen – or users may look to the illicit market

If you have had your building destroyed and looted, which many people believe will occur in the future, we recommend the immediate filing of an insurance claim with an insurance claim adjuster. As you can see, however, there will be many questions as to your coverage. Brown – O’Haver can help. We have been involved in many such claims over the years and stand ready to assist insureds at any time.