Broker fined for not disclosing disciplinary history

Hand holding business card

A Manitoba broker has been fined $500 and ordered to pay investigation costs of $2,000 for failing to disclose to the province’s broker regulator that he had previously been the subject of a disciplinary investigation by B.C.’s broker regulator.

“The licensee falsely declared on his licensing applications, dated May 5, 2020, May 12, 2021, and July 28, 2021, that he had not been under investigation by any regulatory or licensing authority; when in fact he had received notice from the [B.C.] regulator on June 21, 2019 that he was under investigation, and in April 2021 he was aware of the regulator’s hearing on May 4, 2021,” the Insurance Council of Manitoba (ICM) ruled in a decision released late June.

Through his lawyer, the broker, Barzin Assadi, explained the declarations were based on a misunderstanding of the questions on the licensing application. He admitted to a careless review of his answers before he submitted them to Manitoba’s broker council.

“Mr. Assadi failed to disclose the [B.C. regulator’s] investigation on four separate occasions: Aug. 20, 2019, May 5, 2020, May 12, 2021, and July 28, 2021,” the broker’s lawyer noted in a letter to the Insurance Council of Manitoba. “Mr. Assadi has acknowledged his obvious carelessness in his review and completion of the questions on those occasions and that he accepts responsibility for his errors….

“Mr. Assadi unfortunately initially misread the question on Aug. 20, 2019, as enquiring only as to past and completed investigations and disciplinary matters (rather than ongoing investigations) and then unfortunately compounded his initial mistake by providing the same answer on each subsequent occasion without re-reading the question given his relevant circumstances had not changed since August 2019.

See also  Low Income Californians Face Hurdles And Red Tape When Applying For EV Incentives

“Mr. Assadi acknowledges that he ought to have more carefully reviewed the ICM renewal application questions on each occasion.”

Other disciplinary decisions : How a simple office procedural error led to a fine for a broker, the nominee, and the brokerage

The B.C. regulator’s investigation was still ongoing when Assadi made his license disclosures to the Manitoba regulator.

In fact, the B.C. investigation did not come to a formal conclusion until the Insurance Council of B.C. published a final decision in September 2021 that ordered Assadi to pay a fine of $2,000 and investigation costs of $2,125 over a breach of the B.C. regulator’s code of conduct for managing client information.

In the B.C. investigation, the B.C. regulator was acting on a complaint that Assadi “had copied confidential and proprietary information from [a] former employer’s computer system onto a USB drive,” as the Insurance Council of B.C.’s decision ruled.

In its final decision, released after Assadi made his filings for his Manitoba license, the Insurance Council of B.C. raised three issues:

Assadi stored client information on his personal device, “notwithstanding the implied expectation of clients that the information would only be used for authorized business purposes.”
The broker co-mingled client information with his personal information and documents.
There was a lack of passwords or other reasonable safeguards to protect the client information on the personal USB drive from unauthorized access by others.

In the B.C. matter, Assadi’s lawyer noted his client had turned the USB drive over to the former employer. In addition, the current employer isolated a folder on its computer system that contained a copy of the files from the USB drive, restricting access to the folder according to a procedure approved by the former employer. Finally, Assadi and his current employer agreed to a forensic IT audit of the licensee’s home computer and the current employer’s computing system.

See also  Yvonne Steiner, Zurich Canada

 

Feature image courtesy of iStock.com/zoomstudio