Taxpayer organizations launch lawsuit against gun insurance law

Read more: San Jose approves first-ever insurance law for firearm owners

But taxpayer organizations Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, the Silicon Valley Public Accountability Foundation, and the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association are critical with the law’s fee requirement. Together with local residents James Barry and George Arrington, five organizations have filed a lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court last week, The Mercury News reported.

While this is not the first time San Jose’s gun insurance law faced a legal challenge – the National Association for Gun Rights immediately launched its own lawsuit after San Jose City Council passed the legislation in January – Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association director of legal affairs Tim Bittle explained that this new lawsuit has nothing to do with the Second Amendment.

“Our interest is not in the right to own guns,” said Bittle. “But we’re very concerned about the potential precedent that could be set by this unusual requirement that gun owners pay a fee to a private nonprofit organization, which then has control of how the revenue of the fee gets spent.”

In the lawsuit, the organizations claimed that the insurance law’s fee is more of a tax. It goes on to argue that taxes require two-thirds voter approval by the California Constitution. The organizations also maintain that the legislation violates free speech rights, since gun owners are required to pay a nonprofit – whose message may be against their will.

Mayor Sam Liccardo issued a statement in response to the lawsuit, saying that “no good deed goes unlitigated.” Liccardo also indicated that he had expected legal challenges to the law, but the city has “spent nearly two years in deep discussion with legal experts throughout the country” and locally about how San Jose could create an ordinance that would be constitutional and enforceable and would help reduce gun risk violence in the community.